Weekly Local weather and Power Information Roundup #529 – Watts Up With That?

The Week That Was: 2022-11-19 (November 19, 2022)
Dropped at You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org)
The Science and Environmental Coverage Mission

Quote of the Week: “We’ve a behavior in writing articles printed in scientific journals to make the work as completed as attainable, to cowl up all of the tracks, to not fear concerning the blind alleys or describe the way you had the incorrect thought first, and so forth. So there isn’t anyplace to publish, in a dignified method, what you truly did to be able to get to do the work.” Richard Feynman, Nobel Lecture, 1966.

Variety of the Week: 0.003°C per yr. Temperature from 200 meteorological stations: common fee of 0.005°C, per yr throughout the previous half century.

THIS WEEK:

By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Coverage Mission (SEPP)

Scope: Writing in Actual Clear Power, AMO Physics Professor Emeritus William Happer has an efficient essay explaining why there is no such thing as a harmful warming from pure gasoline (largely methane, CH4) which is significant for sustaining a steady electrical grid. In the meantime the grid is changing into extra fragile as particular curiosity teams falsely declare wind and solar energy is dependable and more cost effective than coal or pure gasoline. TWTW will talk about the essay utilizing components of the essential paper written by Happer and W. A. van Wijngaarden on “Relative Efficiency of Greenhouse Molecules.”

The twenty seventh annual Convention of Events (COP 27) of the UN Framework Conference on Local weather Change (UNFCCC) closed with the COP27 President, Sameh Shoukry declaring that they’re “honest, balanced, and clear in our strategy.” The UN is just not. It intentionally ignores forty years of advances in understanding the constraints of how atmospheric greenhouse gases affect earth’s temperatures. As Howard Hayden demonstrated in final week’s TWTW, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change (IPCC)            “…have supplied incontrovertible proof that their consultant situations are bodily unimaginable.” Even when utilizing the extra modest “situation through which the radiative forcing is 7.0 W/m2” (SSP3-7.0), the IPCC will get the Stefan-Boltzmann regulation incorrect. Thus, none of their projections, forecasts, or long-term shifts in temperatures and climate patterns are based mostly on legal guidelines of physics. TWTW will discover the potential of a time period to explain this deliberate ignorance of advances in science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QENy1YYPKQ

Former parliamentary under-secretary for Power, Science and Expertise Barry Brill of New Zealand has written that in its Sixth Evaluation Report (AR6, 2021) the IPCC backed down from its most excessive place. Nonetheless, as witnessed at COP 27, it makes no distinction to these making fanatical calls for about using fossil fuels together with monumental switch funds from the US to growing nations. TWTW will assessment just a few of the outstanding and constructive adjustments that humanity has skilled, due to using these fuels.

In discussing the hypocrisy of COP 27, environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg brings up research on the super advantages to humanity in recent times from rural electrification, which requires dependable electrical energy, which can’t be provided by wind or solar energy.

************************

No Garments? In discussing the absence of vital considering demonstrated by the Biden Administration in its intensifying laws on the manufacturing of pure gasoline (methane), William Happer begins with the Hans Christian Anderson’s story “The Emperor’s New Garments.” Happer writes:

“In Biden’s case, the brand new garments are the nonsense that there’s a local weather emergency. However who would need to be thought of “unfit for his workplace” or “unusually silly” by questioning whether or not there actually is an emergency? So, resplendent in his new regalia, President Biden has proposed laws on methane emissions by the U.S. oil and gasoline business, at a direct price of greater than $1 billion yearly, to cope with a nonexistent downside.

“Actually, there is no such thing as a local weather emergency and there won’t be one, with or with out new laws on methane emissions. Methane, the molecule CH4, is the principle constituent of pure gasoline. Animals like cattle and sheep belch methane as they chew their cud. They can get extra power from forage by digesting a number of the cellulose with the help of methane-generating microorganisms of their stomachs. Termites use the identical trick to digest wooden. Microorganisms in soils, notably rice paddies, additionally emit giant quantities of methane.

“To grasp why methane regulation can be irrelevant to local weather, it’s mandatory to debate just a few numbers. This isn’t customary in local weather discussions, that are often extra based mostly in emotion than in truth.

“Like water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O), methane is a naturally occurring greenhouse gasoline. Along with clouds, greenhouse gases management how warmth added to the Earth by daylight is returned as thermal infrared radiation to house. Greenhouse gases impede the move of warmth from Earth’s floor to house. 

“The small print of how this occurs are significantly extra difficult than described by the adjective ‘heat-trapping.’ A lot of the warmth switch close to the floor is because of convection of moist air and has little to do with greenhouse gases. And the way the temperature varies with altitude at numerous places on Earth’s floor is as essential because the focus of greenhouse gases.

“Few understand that giant will increase within the concentrations of greenhouse gases trigger very small adjustments within the warmth stability of the ambiance. Doubling the focus of methane – a 100% enhance, which might take about 200 years on the present development charges – would cut back the warmth move to house by solely 0.3%, resulting in a mean world temperature change of solely 0.2 °C. That is lower than one-quarter of the change in temperature noticed over the previous 150 years. 

“A lot of the predicted catastrophic warming from greenhouse gasoline emissions is because of constructive feedbacks which are extremely speculative, at finest. In accordance with Le Chatelier’s precept, most feedbacks of pure methods are destructive, not constructive.

So, even when laws on U.S. methane emissions might utterly cease the rise of atmospheric methane (they’ll’t), they might possible solely decrease the common world temperature within the yr 2222 by about 0.2 °C, a totally trivial quantity on condition that people have tailored to a a lot bigger change over the previous century whereas decreasing local weather deaths by over 98%.”

In explaining “U.S. to Sharply Lower Methane Air pollution that Threatens the Local weather and Public Well being” November 2, 2022, the EPA claims:

“One third of the warming from greenhouse gases occurring at the moment is because of human-caused emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gasoline that traps about 30 occasions as a lot warmth as carbon dioxide over 100 years, and sharp cuts over the following decade can have a near-term helpful affect on the local weather. In the USA, the oil and pure gasoline business is the most important industrial supply of methane emissions, emitting extra methane than the overall emissions of all greenhouse gases from 164 nations mixed.”

The EPA’s claims are substantiated by nothing however phrases and fashions that fail primary testing towards the true ambiance. Professor Happer’s evaluation is predicated on detailed calculations of “Relative Efficiency of Greenhouse Molecules.”

“The forcings because of altering concentrations of Earth’s 5 most essential, naturally occurring greenhouse gases, H2O, CO2, O3, N2O and CH4 in addition to CF4 and SF6 have been evaluated for the case of a cloud-free ambiance.”

Clouds will solely reduce the greenhouse impact; thus, the evaluation gives an higher certain. The information used is from the HITRAN Database, which is nicely examined. A lot of America’s weapons methods rely on it, together with the Sidewinders, Stinger, and Javelin infrared guided missiles, in addition to night time imaginative and prescient gadgets. The summary additional states:

“For present atmospheric concentrations, the per-molecule forcings of the plentiful greenhouse gases H2O and CO2 are suppressed by 4 orders of magnitude. The forcings of the much less plentiful greenhouse gases, O3, N2O and CH4, are additionally suppressed, however a lot much less so.”

On this case, an order of magnitude is an influence of ten, thus the effectiveness of carbon dioxide in an environment with no CO2 is 10,000 occasions that of including CO2 to at the moment’s ambiance. In writing:

“One third of the warming from greenhouse gases occurring at the moment is because of human-caused emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gasoline that traps about 30 occasions as a lot warmth as carbon dioxide over 100 years…”

…the EPA demonstrates that it’s unaware of the greenhouse impact, and insists on utilizing deceptive and false phrases. There seems that there is no such thing as a one on this administration who’s succesful or will communicate out concerning the profound distortions by the administration regarding atmospheric bodily science.

Happer concludes his essay with:

“Biden and his advisors ought to reassess his new garments and bear in mind the smart phrase of the poet Alexander Pope:

”’Somewhat studying is a harmful factor;

“’Drink deep or style not the Pierian spring.

“’There shallow draughts intoxicate mind,

“’And ingesting largely sobers us once more.’

“Somewhat studying actually is a harmful factor. Be taught just a few extra scientific information and sober up, President Biden!”

See hyperlinks underneath Difficult the Orthodoxy and https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/us-sharply-cut-methane-pollution-threatens-climate-and-public-health

************************

Purposeful Illiteracy: Years in the past, when instructing economics and statistics, Haapala realized that many college students might know the proper phrases however don’t perceive what the phrases imply. The arrival of statistical packages for laptop computer computer systems might have solely worsened the state of affairs. Calculations and numerous statistical strategies have limitations. One should perceive these limitations earlier than making use of such strategies.

In writing his paper on the inaccurate statistics used to attribute likelihood assessments to excessive climate occasions, Ross McKitrick uncovered papers, maybe 10,000 papers, that didn’t appropriately interpret the Gauss-Markov Theorem on the assumptions wanted to use bizarre least squares to offer one of the best unbiased estimate (BLUE) attainable.

This downside is compounded by politicians and bureaucrats who’re mathematically illiterate. A 1988 guide by mathematician John Allen Paulos defined the issue nicely: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Penalties. Based on the guide’s description on Amazon:

“Why do even well-educated individuals perceive so little about arithmetic? And what are the prices of our innumeracy? John Allen Paulos, in his celebrated bestseller first printed in 1988, argues that our lack of ability to deal rationally with very giant numbers and the chances related to them leads to misinformed governmental insurance policies, confused private selections, and an elevated susceptibility to pseudoscience of every kind. Innumeracy lets us know what we’re lacking, and the way we will do one thing about it.’

The issue exists past arithmetic, as doctor and molecular biologist of the Hoover Establishment Henry Miller wrote in “Scientifically Illiterate America”:

“At the very least a modicum of scientific literacy is essential for residents. Because the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry’s primer noticed: ‘It’s crucial that policymakers, the media, and most of the people are in a position to distinguish the information from mere interpretations of a biased constituency. Determination-makers and people who inform them should have the ability to decide the standard of the science and reasoning that helps a place and should know whether or not a set of scientific findings is de facto significant to a choice.’

“Nonetheless, even when the science is sound and the information are ‘significant,’ politicians and authorities officers generally ignore them, typically in the reason for bureaucratic empire-building, advancing some ideological objective, or capitulating to activists. After I was an official on the Meals and Drug Administration, I as soon as heard a Clinton administration undersecretary of agriculture, who beforehand had headed an anti-technology advocacy group, deconstruct science: ‘You may have ‘your’ science or ‘my’ science or ‘any individual else’s’ science. By nature, there may be going to be a distinction.’ Translation: ‘I don’t care about information or the consensus within the scientific group. My opinions are simply as legitimate.’

“The great thing about the scientific technique, when carried out proper, is that it protects us from ideology and bias, and helps us perceive what’s true and what actually works. At its finest, science can inform sound public coverage. However after we ignore or misread science, we transfer backwards towards a time when irrationality and superstition prevailed.” [Boldface added]

To keep away from transferring “backward towards a time when irrationality and superstition prevailed,” TWTW and SEPP attempt to emphasize that each one proof should be thought of and correctly introduced. TWTW describes as “useful illiteracy” using essential ideas with out absolutely understanding them, together with their limits.

In bureaucracies, similar to authorities, all too typically a bit little bit of exaggeration grows to a substantial amount of exaggeration. We’ve seen this on how rising greenhouse gases might trigger a little bit of warming has grown to a “local weather disaster” or “local weather emergency.” See hyperlinks underneath Different Scientific Information and https://www.amazon.com/Innumeracy-Mathematical-Illiteracy-Its-Penalties/dp/0809074478.

************************

A Small, Meaningless Concession: Barry Brill, of New Zealand has written that in its Sixth Evaluation Report (AR6, 2021) the IPCC has backed down from its most excessive emissions situation. An identical essay by Judith Curry appeared in Local weather And many others. on November 2 (Nov 5 TWTW). The common of all their modeled temperatures disagrees with measurements and can accomplish that even after they abandon probably the most excessive one. Sadly, the harm brought on by the exaggeration of the IPCC has been carried out. Many nations are making excessive claims of damages from world warming which are little greater than workout routines in excessive greed. For instance, Colombia is claiming an annual lack of $800 billion, about 2.5 occasions its gross home product.

As mentioned in final week’s TWTW, AMO physicist Howard Hayden confirmed that for the primary time in its studies, AR6 of the IPCC introduced up the Stefan-Boltzmann regulation and acquired it completely incorrect. The authors of AR6 calculated a rise in infrared radiation emitted by the floor to be about one-third of that that will be emitted if the earth’s temperature rises 3.6ºC, the central estimate. Purposeful Illiteracy in motion. See hyperlinks underneath Difficult the Orthodoxy and After Paris.

************************

Advantages of the Industrial Revolution: Based on IPCC studies, world warming began with industrial CO2 emissions, about within the yr 1850 in England. Based on “Our World in Knowledge”, in 1850 about 74% of the world’s inhabitants lived in excessive poverty, a hand-to-mouth existence. At the moment, about 10% of a a lot bigger inhabitants lives in excessive poverty.

“However even after two centuries of progress, excessive poverty remains to be the fact for each tenth particular person on the planet. That is what the ‘worldwide poverty line’ highlights – this metric performs an essential (and profitable) position in focusing the world’s consideration on these very poorest individuals on the planet.

“The poorest individuals at the moment dwell in nations which have achieved no development. This stagnation of the world’s poorest economies is without doubt one of the largest issues of our time. Except this adjustments thousands and thousands of individuals will proceed to dwell in excessive poverty.”

A lot of the excessive poverty is in Africa, the place the UN, WEF, and different “do-good” organizations are unwittingly making an attempt to cease financial development. Given their Purposeful Illiteracy, the cruelty of those organizations is obscure. Based on Our World in Knowledge, in 1850 life expectancy was 29.3 years (with little information exterior of Europe and the Americas). In 2019 it was 72.6 years. Though there have been deficiencies and inequalities, the Industrial Revolution has been an incredible profit to humanity. However what number of lecturers calculating the “Social Value of Carbon” take these numbers into consideration?

One of many nice advantages from industrialization has been regular, dependable electrical energy. Trendy business requires dependable, reasonably priced electrical energy. In addressing the hypocrisy exhibited at COP 27, environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg brings up research on the advantages of rural electrification. This led to different research in numerous areas of the globe.

By the Nineteen Twenties most US cities and cities had electrical energy. However as late as 1932, solely about 10% of rural America had electrical energy. Franklin Roosevelt made rural electrification a problem in his 1932 presidential marketing campaign. By the Fifties the duty was largely accomplished, with many properties having electrical home equipment. Now this administration and the IPCC are declaring that dependable, reasonably priced electrical energy is dangerous to humanity?

See hyperlinks underneath After Paris!, https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty-in-brief, and https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

************************

Variety of the Week: 0.003°C per yr. Temperature from 200 meteorological stations: common fee of 0.005°C per yr throughout the previous half century. Many sources of claims of harmful world warming from people including carbon dioxide to the ambiance cite the work of British steam engineer and beginner meteorologist Man Stewart Callendar for revising the 19^th century work on carbon dioxide and temperatures. The founding father of the idea of greenhouse gases, John Tyndall, used spectroscopy to ascertain the warming impact, and but at the moment’s local weather modelers ignore fashionable work within the discipline, which is utilized by van Wijngaarden and Happer.

A hyperlink in Nature Human Behaviour led to a hyperlink of a 2007 replica of Calendar’s authentic paper in a 1938 publication by the Royal Meteorological Society. Sadly, because of restrictions, TWTW couldn’t copy the Abstract. It reads:

“By gas combustion man has added about 150,000 million tons of carbon dioxide to the air throughout the previous half century. The writer estimates from one of the best accessible information that roughly three quarters of this has remained within the ambiance.

“That radiation absorption coefficients of carbon dioxide and water vapor are used to point out the impact of carbon dioxide on ‘sky radiation.’ From this the rise in imply temperature, as a result of synthetic manufacturing of carbon dioxide, is estimated to be on the fee of 0.003°C per yr this present day.

“The temperature observations at 200 meteorological stations are used to point out that world temperatures have truly elevated at a mean fee of 0.005°C per yr throughout the previous half century.”

Evidently, TWTW should be an excessive anti-science, local weather denier. The Earth is now within the cooling Meghalayan age, of the nice and cozy Holocene geological epoch, within the Quaternary interval of frequent glaciations. Glaciation can decrease the earth’s temperatures within the temperate areas (the place most individuals dwell) and polar areas by 10°C or extra. A warming of 0.5°C per century needs to be welcome. See hyperlinks underneath Under the Backside Line and Altering Local weather.

Difficult the Orthodoxy — NIPCC

Local weather Change Reconsidered II: Bodily Science

Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental Worldwide Panel on Local weather Change (NIPCC), 2013